Ensuring Food Safety as per ISO 22000: Effective Control of Nonconformities, Corrective Actions, and Product Withdrawals

Introduction
Food safety is essential for protecting consumers and maintaining compliance with regulations. Despite preventive measures, nonconformities can arise, requiring swift corrective actions and proper handling of affected products. Organizations must identify unsafe products, implement corrective measures and manage withdrawals efficiently. A proactive, well-documented approach ensures food safety hazards are controlled, preventing risks and strengthening consumer trust. This blog explores key strategies for controlling nonconformities, corrective actions and product withdrawals to uphold food safety standards.
Control of nonconformity
Corrections
The organization shall ensure that when critical limits for CCP(s) are exceeded, or there is a loss of control of operational PRP(s), the products affected are identified and controlled with regard to their use and release. A documented procedure shall be established and maintained defining
- The identification and assessment of affected end products to determine their proper handling.
- A review of the corrections carried out.
Products manufactured under conditions where critical limits have been exceeded are potentially unsafe products and shall be handled. Products manufactured under conditions where operational PRP(s) have not been conformed with shall be evaluated with respect to the cause(s) of the nonconformity and to the consequences thereof in terms of food safety and shall, where necessary, be handled. The evaluation shall be recorded. All corrections shall be approved by the responsible person(s) and shall be recorded together with information on the nature of the nonconformity, its cause(s) and consequence(s), including information needed for traceability purposes related to the nonconforming lots.
Corrective actions
Data derived from the monitoring of operational PRPs and CCPs shall be evaluated by designated person(s) with sufficient knowledge and authority to initiate corrective actions. Corrective actions shall be initiated when critical limits are exceeded or when there is a lack of conformity with operational PRP(s).
The organization shall establish and maintain documented procedures that specify appropriate actions to and eliminate the cause of detected nonconformities, to prevent recurrence, and to bring the process or system back into control after nonconformity is encountered. These actions include
- Reviewing nonconformities (including customer complaints).
- Reviewing trends in monitoring results that may indicate development towards loss of control.
- Determining the cause(s) of nonconformities.
- Evaluating the need for action to ensure that nonconformities do not recur.
- Determining and implementing the actions needed.
- Recording the results of corrective actions.
- Reviewing corrective actions taken to ensure that they are effective.
Corrective actions shall be recorded.
Handling of potentially unsafe products
- General
The organization shall handle nonconforming products by taking action(s) to prevent the nonconforming product from entering the food chain unless it is possible to ensure that
- The food safety hazard(s) of concern has been reduced to the defined acceptable levels.
- The food safety hazard(s) of concern will be reduced to identified acceptable levels prior to entering into the food chain.
- The product still meets the defined acceptable level(s) of the food safety hazard(s) of concern despite the nonconformity.
All lots of products that may have been affected by a nonconforming situation shall be held under control of the organization until they have been evaluated. If products that have left the control of the organization are subsequently determined to be unsafe, the organization shall notify relevant interested parties and initiate a withdrawal.
NOTE: The term “withdrawal” includes recall.
The controls and related responses and authorization for dealing with potentially unsafe products shall be documented.
- Evaluation for release
Each lot of products affected by the nonconformity shall only be released as safe when any of the following conditions apply:
- Evidence other than the monitoring system demonstrates that the control measures have been effective.
- Evidence shows that the combined effect of the control measures for that particular product complies with the performance intended (i.e. identified acceptable levels as identified.
- The results of sampling, analysis and/or other verification activities demonstrate that the affected lot of product complies with the identified acceptable levels for the food safety hazard(s) concerned.
- Disposition of nonconforming products
Following evaluation, if the lot of products is not acceptable for release it shall be handled by one of the following activities:
- Reprocessing or further processing within or outside the organization to ensure that the food safety hazard is eliminated or reduced to acceptable levels.
- destruction and/or disposal as waste.
Withdrawals
To enable and facilitate the complete and timely withdrawal of lots of end products which have been identified as unsafe
- Top management shall appoint personnel having the authority to initiate a withdrawal and personnel responsible for executing the withdrawal.
- The organization shall establish and maintain a documented procedure for
- Notification to relevant interested parties (e. g. statutory and regulatory authorities, customers and/or consumers).
- Handling of withdrawn products as well as affected lots of the products still in stock.
- The sequence of actions to be taken.
- Withdrawn products shall be secured or held under supervision until they are destroyed, used for purposes other than originally intended, determined to be safe for the same (or other) intended use, or reprocessed in a manner to ensure they become safe.
The cause, extent and result of a withdrawal shall be recorded and reported to top management as input to the management review.
The organization shall verify and record the effectiveness of the withdrawal programme through the use of appropriate techniques (e.g. mock withdrawal or practice withdrawal).
Conclusion
Ensuring food safety requires a robust system for identifying, correcting, and preventing nonconformities. By implementing effective corrective actions, handling potentially unsafe products responsibly, and executing timely product withdrawals, when necessary, organizations can safeguard consumer health and maintain regulatory compliance. A well-documented and proactive approach strengthens food safety management and enhances trust in the brand.
Types Of Certification
- ISO Certification
- ISO 9001 Certification
- ISO 14001 Certification
- ISO 45001 Certification
- ISO 22000 Certification
- ISO 27001 Certification
- ISO 17025 Certification
- ISO 13485 Certification
- ISO 20000-1 Certification
- ISO 22301 Certification
- ISO 50001 Certification
- ISO 37001 Certification
- IATF 16949 Certification
- ISO 29001 Certification
- ISO 31000 Certification
- ISO 20121 Certification
- ISO 10002 Certification
- ISO 41001 Certification
Get Free Consultation
Our Clients


















Call to Action (CTA)
Is your organization prepared to handle food safety nonconformities effectively? Contact Popularcert today to implement a strong food safety management system and ensure compliance with international standards!
GET A FREE CONSULTATION NOW
FAQs
What should an organization do when a critical limit for a CCP is exceeded?
When a critical limit is exceeded, the affected products must be identified, controlled, and evaluated to determine proper handling. Corrective actions should be taken, documented, and approved by responsible personnel to prevent unsafe products from entering the food chain.
How should nonconforming products be handled?
Nonconforming products should be controlled to prevent unsafe food from reaching consumers. They can be reprocessed to ensure food safety hazards are eliminated, or they must be destroyed/disposed of if they cannot be made safe.
What is the difference between a withdrawal and a recall?
A withdrawal refers to removing unsafe products from distribution before they reach consumers, while a recall involves retrieving products already in the market due to safety concerns. Both processes require notifying relevant parties and documenting corrective actions.
How can an organization verify the effectiveness of its withdrawal program?
Organizations should conduct mock or practice withdrawals to test the effectiveness of their withdrawal procedures. Regular verification helps ensure that actual withdrawals can be executed efficiently and in compliance with regulatory requirements.